OUTPUT

Image5.gif (1467 byte)

LEONARDO
A Model for the Evaluation of
Continuing Training

4. Output / Follow-Up

Output

The Requisites of the System

Creating an Evaluation Culture

Criteria for Selecting

Check List	Notes and action plan	Self-assessment					Total
		1	2	3	4	5
Effectiveness 1. How has the evaluation process been used to reflect on the following: (i) The methods used to understand trainees’ needs and levels of knowledge, (ii) The achievement of learning objectives, (iii) The testing of trainees’ achievements, (iv) The appropriateness of course contents, (v) The quality of student / trainer interactions, (vi) The timing and location, (vii) The innovative aspects of the project, (viii) Possible improvements for future projects? 2. How has satisfaction been measured: (i) For the client, (ii) For the trainee? 3. Have the outcomes been assessed: (i) For the client eg. improvements to organisational effectiveness, transfer to other workers? (ii) For the trainee (eg. value of certificate, promotion, job placement), (iii) For the provider (eg. improvements to market position),
(iv) For other stakeholders (eg. local authorities)?
Efficiency 4. What was the relative cost in terms of: (i) Budgeted costs/actual costs, (ii) Unit cost per trainee (eg. per hour, per day), (iii) Teaching as a percentage of total cost,
(iv) Selected items as percentage of total cost?
Evaluation of the evaluation process 5. Have the evaluation methods used been appropriate?
TOTAL

Overall rating

Phase	Strategy	Planning & design	Delivery/monitor.	Output/follow-up
Self-Assessment
Total